자료유형  

 학위논문

Control Number  

0017164936

International Standard Book Number  

9798384088318

Dewey Decimal Classification Number  

320

Main Entry-Personal Name  

Gurevich, Victoria.

Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  

[S.l.] : The Ohio State University., 2024

Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  

Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024

Physical Description  

382 p.

General Note  

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: B.

General Note  

Advisor: Gelpi, Christopher F.

Dissertation Note  

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2024.

Summary, Etc.  

요약Why have some countries returned their citizens from the Islamic State while others have not? Ever since ISIS was 'defeated', roughly 11,000 foreign women and children and another 2,000 men have been held in detentions centers and makeshift prisons in Syria for their affiliation with the terror group. An unprecedented phenomenon has emerged however as many of these foreign nationals, whose citizenships are known, are not being acknowledged by their home countries. The variation in some 60 state policies towards the repatriation of citizens from the Islamic State is well documented-we can see in practice how states choose to handle their citizens who were affiliated with ISIL-however, there has been no systemic examination of what accounts for the variation in these policies. In other words, we do not know why, when presented with the problem of returning citizens from the Islamic State and taking on all of the associated challenges of investigation, prosecution, rehabilitation, and social reintegration, have some states met the task head on while others have avoided the problem.This research makes two arguments. The first is that repatriation is a state problem. Although, the problem of repatriation exists at the international level-where men, women and children are held as ISIS fighters and affiliates-the solution exists at the national level, where these men, women and children are citizens who need to be repatriation and reintegrated. The misalignment between where the repatriation problem exists and where it must be resolved has created an imprecise conceptualization of the repatriation task, consequently leading to ineffective argumentation for and implementation of return. After reframing repatriation as a national issue, my second argument is that repatriation should not be viewed as a single decision that is made but is rather the outcome of different conditions of possibility. Which is to say, repatriation is not a monolithic policy decision that is borne by one actor in a single space at a set time. Instead, I propose that repatriation policy is the result of a host of processes that occur at multiple levels of society and state, across various points in time, in ways that are directly and peripherally related to the task. As such, in order to understand how states make repatriation policy, it is necessary to move beyond a one-dimensional view of policy making and consider the matter holistically, taking into account the entire economy of influence, decision-making, and decision-makers.

Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  

Political science.

Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  

Behavioral sciences.

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Foreign national repatriation

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Islamic State

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Foreign fighters

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Radicalization

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Rehabilitation

Added Entry-Corporate Name  

The Ohio State University Political Science

Host Item Entry  

Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-04B.

Electronic Location and Access  

로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.

Control Number  

joongbu:655915