본문

서브메뉴

Family Member and Intimate Partner Efforts to Reduce Firearm Access When Their Loved One Is at Risk of Harming Themselves or Others- [electronic resource]
내용보기
Family Member and Intimate Partner Efforts to Reduce Firearm Access When Their Loved One Is at Risk of Harming Themselves or Others- [electronic resource]
자료유형  
 학위논문
Control Number  
0016934603
International Standard Book Number  
9798380144988
Dewey Decimal Classification Number  
364
Main Entry-Personal Name  
Paruk, Jennifer.
Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  
[S.l.] : Michigan State University., 2023
Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023
Physical Description  
1 online resource(95 p.)
General Note  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
General Note  
Advisor: Holt, Karen.
Dissertation Note  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2023.
Restrictions on Access Note  
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Summary, Etc.  
요약Family members and intimate partners [families] are uniquely positioned to reduce firearm access when their adult loved one is at risk of harming themselves or others, thereby preventing firearm injury. Yet we know little on how or when families are doing so, and if these efforts are safe and/or legal. To identify how and when families were reducing firearm access, a content analysis was conducted using police reports from Extreme Risk Protection Order [ERPO] petitions. These police reports were from the events that inspired police to file for the ERPO [precipitating event or PE] against the at-risk individual [respondent]. This content analysis identified and characterized the ways families tried to reduce the respondent's firearm access at three time-points: before the PE, during the PE, and after police arrived at the PE. Next, supervised machine learning determined which respondent and PE characteristics were the most influential in predicting whether families reduced firearm access after police arrived at the PE.The content analysis identified that families reduced the respondent's firearm access in numerous ways. Some families tried to prevent the respondent from accessing a firearm before the PE occurred, with a small number of police reports (2.54%) indicating such efforts. Fifteen percent of reports included information that families tried to keep firearms away from the respondent during the PE: Families hid firearms, sometimes in places where others could access them; asked the respondent for the firearms; and used physical force to try to take firearms. Just over a quarter (26.51%) of reports included information that families reduced firearm access after police officers arrived at the PE. Families gave officers consent and access to search for and remove firearms, asked police for help removing firearms, gave police firearms, and told officers they would continue to prevent firearm access after officers left the scene, including by temporarily storing firearms outside of the home. In the supervised machine learning model, two of the most influential variables predicting whether families reduced firearm access after police arrived at the PE were if the respondent was taken for an involuntary examination (which allows officers to remove firearms) and if officers told someone at the scene about ERPOs.The findings highlight that when families tried to prevent their loved ones from accessing firearms, they sometimes put themselves and others at risk of injury. Additionally, the temporary transfer of firearms to families outside the respondent's home without a background check- while legal in Florida-may not be legal in other states with universal background check laws. The supervised machine learning models indicate which respondent and incident characteristics should be explored in more detail in future research. Finally, many of the supervised machine learning models had low sensitivity, indicating that indicating that there are likely other influential variables in predicting families reducing firearm access after police arrive that were not included in this study.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Criminology.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Individual & family studies.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Law.
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Firearm injury
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Family members
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Harming
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Machine learning
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Injury
Added Entry-Corporate Name  
Michigan State University Criminal Justice - Doctor of Philosophy
Host Item Entry  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-02A.
Host Item Entry  
Dissertation Abstract International
Electronic Location and Access  
로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
Control Number  
joongbu:643812
신착도서 더보기
최근 3년간 통계입니다.

소장정보

  • 예약
  • 캠퍼스간 도서대출
  • 서가에 없는 책 신고
  • 나의폴더
소장자료
등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
TQ0029706 T   원문자료 열람가능/출력가능 열람가능/출력가능
마이폴더 부재도서신고

* 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

관련도서

관련 인기도서

도서위치