본문

서브메뉴

Implementation of Traumatic Brain Injury Screening in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Prospective Mixed Methods Study- [electronic resource]
내용보기
Implementation of Traumatic Brain Injury Screening in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Prospective Mixed Methods Study- [electronic resource]
자료유형  
 학위논문
Control Number  
0016935841
International Standard Book Number  
9798380596626
Dewey Decimal Classification Number  
614
Main Entry-Personal Name  
Coxe Hyzak, Kathryn A.
Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  
[S.l.] : The Ohio State University., 2023
Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023
Physical Description  
1 online resource(242 p.)
General Note  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
General Note  
Advisor: Bunger, Alicia C.
Dissertation Note  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2023.
Restrictions on Access Note  
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Summary, Etc.  
요약Background: Approximately 50% of individuals seeking treatment for substance use and mental health conditions in behavioral healthcare settings have a lifetime history of TBI affecting their ability to engage in behavioral health treatment. Identifying lifetime history of TBI using validated screening methods can optimize interventions for these individuals, however, TBI screening adoption has failed in these settings. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Diffusion of Innovations Theory, this explanatory sequential mixed methods study aimed to improve our understanding about how provider characteristics (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control (PBC), intentions), innovation-level factors (acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness), and contextual determinants affect TBI screening adoption in behavioral healthcare settings.Methods: In Phase I, 215 behavioral health providers in the United States completed a training introducing the OSU TBI-ID, followed by a web-based survey assessing attitudes, PBC, subjective norms, and intentions to screen for TBI (Time 1). After one-month, providers completed a second survey assessing the number of TBI screens conducted, and the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of TBI screening (Time 2). Data were analyzed using structural equation modelling with logistic regressions (SEM) and logistic regression with moderation effects. Results informed development of a qualitative interview guide. In Phase II, 20 providers from Phase I participated in interviews to build upon the quantitative results. Data were analyzed thematically and integrated with the quantitative results. Barriers to adoption were also identified and linked to constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Results: Approximately 25% of providers adopted TBI screening, which was driven by motivations to trial the innovation. SEM demonstrated that more favorable attitudes toward TBI screening were associated with an increased odds of screening intentions and adoption, which providers expanded upon in interviews, explaining advantages in guiding diagnostic assessments. Greater subjective norms also demonstrated increased odds of intentions to screen for TBI and adoption. However, providers reported lack of external pressures from state governing boards and internal pressures from leadership to adopt TBI screening. Although PBC was not associated with TBI screening adoption in SEM, providers reported the desire for additional training and education to improve self-efficacy in administering TBI screening. Furthermore, although no interaction effects were found between characteristics of providers and innovationlevel factors, descriptive ratings and qualitative appraisals of the acceptability feasibility, and appropriateness of TBI screening were high. Providers confirmed in qualitative interviews that the OSU TBI-ID is helpful in guiding clinical decisions, easy to use, and relevant to clinical practice. However, 10 barriers were identified to affect adoption, which linked to CFIR's Inner-Setting, Outer-Setting, Individual Characteristics, and Process.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Public health.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Social work.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Behavioral sciences.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Health care management.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Social research.
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Traumatic brain injury
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Implementation science
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Mixed methods
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Structural equation modeling
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Theory of Planned Behavior
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Diffusion of Innovation Theory
Added Entry-Corporate Name  
The Ohio State University Social Work
Host Item Entry  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-04B.
Host Item Entry  
Dissertation Abstract International
Electronic Location and Access  
로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
Control Number  
joongbu:642540
신착도서 더보기
최근 3년간 통계입니다.

소장정보

  • 예약
  • 캠퍼스간 도서대출
  • 서가에 없는 책 신고
  • 나의폴더
소장자료
등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
TQ0028457 T   원문자료 열람가능/출력가능 열람가능/출력가능
마이폴더 부재도서신고

* 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

관련도서

관련 인기도서

도서위치