서브메뉴
검색
Implementation of Traumatic Brain Injury Screening in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Prospective Mixed Methods Study- [electronic resource]
Implementation of Traumatic Brain Injury Screening in Behavioral Health Organizations: A Prospective Mixed Methods Study- [electronic resource]
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- Control Number
- 0016935841
- International Standard Book Number
- 9798380596626
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 614
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Coxe Hyzak, Kathryn A.
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- [S.l.] : The Ohio State University., 2023
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023
- Physical Description
- 1 online resource(242 p.)
- General Note
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
- General Note
- Advisor: Bunger, Alicia C.
- Dissertation Note
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2023.
- Restrictions on Access Note
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- Summary, Etc.
- 요약Background: Approximately 50% of individuals seeking treatment for substance use and mental health conditions in behavioral healthcare settings have a lifetime history of TBI affecting their ability to engage in behavioral health treatment. Identifying lifetime history of TBI using validated screening methods can optimize interventions for these individuals, however, TBI screening adoption has failed in these settings. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Diffusion of Innovations Theory, this explanatory sequential mixed methods study aimed to improve our understanding about how provider characteristics (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control (PBC), intentions), innovation-level factors (acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness), and contextual determinants affect TBI screening adoption in behavioral healthcare settings.Methods: In Phase I, 215 behavioral health providers in the United States completed a training introducing the OSU TBI-ID, followed by a web-based survey assessing attitudes, PBC, subjective norms, and intentions to screen for TBI (Time 1). After one-month, providers completed a second survey assessing the number of TBI screens conducted, and the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of TBI screening (Time 2). Data were analyzed using structural equation modelling with logistic regressions (SEM) and logistic regression with moderation effects. Results informed development of a qualitative interview guide. In Phase II, 20 providers from Phase I participated in interviews to build upon the quantitative results. Data were analyzed thematically and integrated with the quantitative results. Barriers to adoption were also identified and linked to constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Results: Approximately 25% of providers adopted TBI screening, which was driven by motivations to trial the innovation. SEM demonstrated that more favorable attitudes toward TBI screening were associated with an increased odds of screening intentions and adoption, which providers expanded upon in interviews, explaining advantages in guiding diagnostic assessments. Greater subjective norms also demonstrated increased odds of intentions to screen for TBI and adoption. However, providers reported lack of external pressures from state governing boards and internal pressures from leadership to adopt TBI screening. Although PBC was not associated with TBI screening adoption in SEM, providers reported the desire for additional training and education to improve self-efficacy in administering TBI screening. Furthermore, although no interaction effects were found between characteristics of providers and innovationlevel factors, descriptive ratings and qualitative appraisals of the acceptability feasibility, and appropriateness of TBI screening were high. Providers confirmed in qualitative interviews that the OSU TBI-ID is helpful in guiding clinical decisions, easy to use, and relevant to clinical practice. However, 10 barriers were identified to affect adoption, which linked to CFIR's Inner-Setting, Outer-Setting, Individual Characteristics, and Process.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Public health.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Social work.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Behavioral sciences.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Health care management.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Social research.
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Traumatic brain injury
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Implementation science
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Mixed methods
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Structural equation modeling
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Theory of Planned Behavior
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Diffusion of Innovation Theory
- Added Entry-Corporate Name
- The Ohio State University Social Work
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-04B.
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertation Abstract International
- Electronic Location and Access
- 로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
- Control Number
- joongbu:642540