서브메뉴
검색
Discretion and Inequity in Agricultural Programs.
Discretion and Inequity in Agricultural Programs.
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- Control Number
- 0017161596
- International Standard Book Number
- 9798382611143
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 320
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Zebrowski, Wesley M.
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- [S.l.] : Indiana University., 2024
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- Physical Description
- 149 p.
- General Note
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
- General Note
- Advisor: Farmer, James.
- Dissertation Note
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2024.
- Summary, Etc.
- 요약In this dissertation, I estimate the impact of discretion in agricultural programs on program payments and enrollment. Specifically, I assess if this discretion leads to inequities geographically and in terms of race, ethnicity, and gender. In Chapter 1, I estimate the differences in aggregate USDA farm program payments by race, ethnicity, and gender using a coarsened exact matching model to account for systematic differences in farm characteristics. I find that historically underserved received more payments than their white and/or male counterparts in some years, with substantial heterogeneity. These results imply that recent efforts to improve racial, ethnic, and gender gaps in funding have seen some success. In Chapter 2, I investigate the impact of alternative rental rate adjustments for the Conservation Reserve Program, which are requested by Farm Service Agency county committees, on enrollment outcomes. I find that positive rate increases lead to a large marginal increase in enrollment, targeted towards general acres and manifesting in a higher rental rate paid to participating farmers. In Chapter 3, I dive deeper into the Conservation Reserve Program to explain the large gap in conservation funding received by Black farmers compared to all other farmers. I find racial inequities along three dimensions: Black farmers receive less due to county-level differences in payment rates, Black farmers receive less positive rate adjustments, and Black farmers participate less in the program when they are not represented on county committees. Together, Chapters 2 and 3 provide new, plausibly causal evidence on the impact of county committees on Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and benefits. All three essays contribute to pressing public policy issues in agriculture and provide results which can tangibly contribute to policy design.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Public policy.
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Agriculture
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Conservation
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Environmental policy
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Equity
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Governance
- Added Entry-Corporate Name
- Indiana University Public Affairs
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-11A.
- Electronic Location and Access
- 로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
- Control Number
- joongbu:657304