본문

서브메뉴

Discretion and Inequity in Agricultural Programs.
内容资讯
Discretion and Inequity in Agricultural Programs.
자료유형  
 학위논문
Control Number  
0017161596
International Standard Book Number  
9798382611143
Dewey Decimal Classification Number  
320
Main Entry-Personal Name  
Zebrowski, Wesley M.
Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  
[S.l.] : Indiana University., 2024
Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
Physical Description  
149 p.
General Note  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
General Note  
Advisor: Farmer, James.
Dissertation Note  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2024.
Summary, Etc.  
요약In this dissertation, I estimate the impact of discretion in agricultural programs on program payments and enrollment. Specifically, I assess if this discretion leads to inequities geographically and in terms of race, ethnicity, and gender. In Chapter 1, I estimate the differences in aggregate USDA farm program payments by race, ethnicity, and gender using a coarsened exact matching model to account for systematic differences in farm characteristics. I find that historically underserved received more payments than their white and/or male counterparts in some years, with substantial heterogeneity. These results imply that recent efforts to improve racial, ethnic, and gender gaps in funding have seen some success. In Chapter 2, I investigate the impact of alternative rental rate adjustments for the Conservation Reserve Program, which are requested by Farm Service Agency county committees, on enrollment outcomes. I find that positive rate increases lead to a large marginal increase in enrollment, targeted towards general acres and manifesting in a higher rental rate paid to participating farmers. In Chapter 3, I dive deeper into the Conservation Reserve Program to explain the large gap in conservation funding received by Black farmers compared to all other farmers. I find racial inequities along three dimensions: Black farmers receive less due to county-level differences in payment rates, Black farmers receive less positive rate adjustments, and Black farmers participate less in the program when they are not represented on county committees. Together, Chapters 2 and 3 provide new, plausibly causal evidence on the impact of county committees on Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and benefits. All three essays contribute to pressing public policy issues in agriculture and provide results which can tangibly contribute to policy design.
Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  
Public policy.
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Agriculture
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Conservation
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Environmental policy
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Equity
Index Term-Uncontrolled  
Governance
Added Entry-Corporate Name  
Indiana University Public Affairs
Host Item Entry  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-11A.
Electronic Location and Access  
로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
Control Number  
joongbu:657304
New Books MORE
최근 3년간 통계입니다.

高级搜索信息

  • 预订
  • 캠퍼스간 도서대출
  • 서가에 없는 책 신고
  • 我的文件夹
材料
注册编号 呼叫号码. 收藏 状态 借信息.
TQ0033522 T   원문자료 열람가능/출력가능 열람가능/출력가능
마이폴더 부재도서신고

*保留在借用的书可用。预订,请点击预订按钮

해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

Related books

Related Popular Books

도서위치