자료유형  

 학위논문

Control Number  

0017163228

International Standard Book Number  

9798384040132

Dewey Decimal Classification Number  

157

Main Entry-Personal Name  

Jiang, Lily Ji.

Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  

[S.l.] : Indiana University., 2024

Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint  

Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024

Physical Description  

346 p.

General Note  

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: A.

General Note  

Advisor: Holtzworth-Munroe, Amy.

Dissertation Note  

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2024.

Summary, Etc.  

요약Four studies examined topics relevant to screening family court cases for intimate partner violence (IPV) in the context of court-affiliated family mediation for divorcing and separating parties. Samples from family courts were collected from Washington D.C. for studies 1-3, and from Baltimore County for study 4. Study 1 identified that higher level of IPV and endorsement of fear, injury, and physical violence significantly increased the likelihood of court staff deciding against in-person joint mediation. Additionally, the IPV victimization "cutoff" score, identified through receiver-operating curve analysis, at which court staff decided against in-person joint mediation was higher for men than women. Study 2 compared cases that attended or did not attend mediation and were offered shuttle or video-conferencing mediation. Parents reporting higher levels of IPV, even among this high IPV sample, were the most likely to not attend shuttle mediation (Jiang et al., 2021). In study 3, although cases that reached mediation agreement reported better outcomes (e.g., felt safer, had fewer court orders) than cases that did not reach mediation agreement and cases that litigated without mediating, 68% of mediation cases did not reach agreement. These cases had more concerning outcomes (e.g., less satisfaction, more harassment from the other parent) compared to outcomes for one or both of the other groups, even in mediation designed to be safer and with parties willing to mediate (Jiang et al., 2023). In study 4, strong internal consistency, a six-factor structure identical to the original IPV victimization screening tool, and significant gender differences replicating existing research (e.g., more sexual violence, fear, and injury for women than men) contributed to evidence of the reliability and validity of a shortened IPV victimization screening tool. Safe, appropriate, and appealing services for parents reporting IPV requires continued examination and development of IPV screening tools and dispute resolution interventions.

Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  

Clinical psychology.

Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  

Psychology.

Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  

Individual & family studies.

Subject Added Entry-Topical Term  

Criminology.

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Divorce

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Family court

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Family mediation

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Intimate partner violence

Index Term-Uncontrolled  

Parental separation

Added Entry-Corporate Name  

Indiana University Psychological & Brain Sciences

Host Item Entry  

Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-03A.

Electronic Location and Access  

로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.

Control Number  

joongbu:656461