서브메뉴
검색
Conceptual and Methodological Considerations Around the Measurement of Implementation in Quantitative Educational Research.
Conceptual and Methodological Considerations Around the Measurement of Implementation in Quantitative Educational Research.
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- Control Number
- 0017165077
- International Standard Book Number
- 9798346809661
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 379.1
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Fernandez Smits, Maria Paz.
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- [S.l.] : University of California, Los Angeles., 2024
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- Physical Description
- 239 p.
- General Note
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: A.
- General Note
- Advisor: Martinez-Fernandez, Jose-Felipe;Christie, Christina.
- Dissertation Note
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2024.
- Summary, Etc.
- 요약This dissertation explores conceptual and methodological issues related to measuring implementation in quantitative educational research. Implementation, defined as the enactment of interventions in educational contexts, plays a pivotal role in understanding how programs operate and affect student outcomes. Despite its importance, there is significant variability in how implementation is conceptualized, measured, and accounted for in research, reflecting the complex relationship between interventions, schools, and outcomes.The study examines these issues through a two-part approach. First, I conduct a systematic review to analyze the frameworks and constructs used to define implementation in a sample of grants awarded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The review highlights the tensions between fidelity (adherence to program design) and adaptation (modifications to the original design). It also assesses the data collection instruments, methods of data reduction, and analytical strategies used to incorporate implementation into outcome evaluations.Second, the dissertation uses data from the implementation of the Success for All (SFA) program to illustrate the practical consequences of methodological choices. Using correlations and hierarchical linear modeling, I estimate the association between different operationalizations of implementation and student outcomes. I also explore how implementation affects estimates of the program's impact, with a particular focus on English Language Learners (ELL) and Special Education (SPED) students. The findings indicate that while higher implementation fidelity correlates with improved outcomes for some groups, it may not benefit others equally, raising concerns about potential inequities.This work underscores the need for nuanced approaches to measuring and accounting for implementation that reconcile fidelity and adaptation frameworks to better understand the schools and classrooms where interventions are delivered. In the context of school improvement, it is especially relevant to consider that adaptations to program design reflect teacher agency and should not be conceptualized only as deviations from the intended intervention.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Educational evaluation.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Education.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Educational technology.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- English as a second language.
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Adaptation
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Fidelity of implementation
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Implementation research
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Program evaluation
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Success for All program
- Added Entry-Corporate Name
- University of California, Los Angeles Education 0249
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-06A.
- Electronic Location and Access
- 로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
- Control Number
- joongbu:655755