서브메뉴
검색
Breaking the Cycle : Leveraging Cross-Party Contact and Empathy Beliefs to Reduce Partisan Conflict.
Breaking the Cycle : Leveraging Cross-Party Contact and Empathy Beliefs to Reduce Partisan Conflict.
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- Control Number
- 0017163738
- International Standard Book Number
- 9798342106962
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 658
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Santos, Luiza Almeida.
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- [S.l.] : Stanford University., 2024
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- Physical Description
- 248 p.
- General Note
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.
- General Note
- Advisor: Zaki, Jamil.
- Dissertation Note
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2024.
- Summary, Etc.
- 요약Empathy is widely regarded as the foundation for prosocial behavior. Yet, in conflicts, many avoid empathizing across group lines, fearing the consequences -- e.g., seeming weak, naive, or immoral. Through surveys, social network analysis, experiments, natural language processing, and live interactions, this dissertation examines the consequences of shifting people's beliefs about the value of cross-group empathy. Chapter 1 introduces empathy beliefs and how they can be used to build concern and connection across differences. Chapters 2-4 (total N= 10,797) draw on the American partisan divide to show how these empathy beliefs can change people's attitudes, feelings, and behaviors in conflict. Specifically, Chapter 2 finds that experimentally inducing people to believe that cross-party empathy is useful leads them to become less affectively polarized and communicate in ways that decrease outpartisans' animosity and attitudinal polarization. Chapter 3 shows that a similar empathy belief intervention leads to increased curiosity about outpartisans' democratic views. Learning about these views strengthens people's own commitment to democratic principles, disrupting processes of democratic backsliding. Chapter 4 provides evidence that empathy beliefs shape people's willingness to talk with outpartisans about disagreements and that these conversations can have unexpected, large, and durable benefits for intergroup relations. Together, these studies highlight empathy beliefs as a promising psychological lever for disrupting cycles of conflict escalation.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Behavior.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Motivation.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Bipartisanship.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Emotional regulation.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Verbal communication.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Power.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Reconciliation.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Violence.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Empathy.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- 21st century.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Attitudes.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Emotions.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Behavioral psychology.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Communication.
- Added Entry-Corporate Name
- Stanford University.
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-04A.
- Electronic Location and Access
- 로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
- Control Number
- joongbu:655063
Buch Status
- Reservierung
- 캠퍼스간 도서대출
- 서가에 없는 책 신고
- Meine Mappe