서브메뉴
검색
Organizational Emergence in the Federal Reserve System: A Negotiated Order Perspective.
Organizational Emergence in the Federal Reserve System: A Negotiated Order Perspective.
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- Control Number
- 0017162255
- International Standard Book Number
- 9798383164150
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 301
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Lista, Peter.
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- [S.l.] : Indiana University., 2024
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- Physical Description
- 157 p.
- General Note
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
- General Note
- Advisor: Rojas, Fabio.
- Dissertation Note
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2024.
- Summary, Etc.
- 요약The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was a compromise between Senate Republicans-who wanted to create a private European-style central bank-and House Democrats-who wanted a public institution that could avoid becoming a "bankers' monopoly." The outcome of their negotiations created a decentralized, bifurcated institution that ostensibly vested supervisory authority in the public Federal Reserve Board and operational authority in the twelve private Federal Reserve Banks. However, the 1913 Act also lacked clear rules defining who had ultimate authority over monetary policy-making within the Federal Reserve System, especially when the interests of the Board and the Banks came into conflict. Absent explicit rules to define their formal responsibilities, neither the Board, the Banks, nor the Treasury had the legal standing (nor political legitimacy) to claim sole authority. This created conflict among the System's stakeholders, as each tried to gain control over monetary policy-making. Between 1914 and 1935 the System underwent a significant shift in its organizational structure, moving from its original decentralized governance model to that of a "real" central bank. In this dissertation, I apply the negotiated order perspective to the case of the Federal Reserve System's governance structure and show that both its initial decentralized structure (as prescribed by the 1913 Act) and the subsequent structural changes (leading to the 1935 Act), were a result of negotiation and a "structural process" extending back decades. Using this historical case, I show that the negotiated order perspective can provide a more comprehensive account of organizational change, generally, and of the emergence of organizational structures, specifically.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Sociology.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Law.
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Emergence
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Federal Reserve System
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Negotiated order
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Organization
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Organizational structures
- Added Entry-Corporate Name
- Indiana University Sociology
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-12A.
- Electronic Location and Access
- 로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
- Control Number
- joongbu:653736
MARC
008250224s2024 us ||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000017162255
■00520250211151951
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798383164150
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31328391
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a301
■1001 ▼aLista, Peter.▼0(orcid)0000-0002-6582-8226
■24510▼aOrganizational Emergence in the Federal Reserve System: A Negotiated Order Perspective.
■260 ▼a[S.l.]▼bIndiana University. ▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a157 p.
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Rojas, Fabio.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2024.
■520 ▼aThe Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was a compromise between Senate Republicans-who wanted to create a private European-style central bank-and House Democrats-who wanted a public institution that could avoid becoming a "bankers' monopoly." The outcome of their negotiations created a decentralized, bifurcated institution that ostensibly vested supervisory authority in the public Federal Reserve Board and operational authority in the twelve private Federal Reserve Banks. However, the 1913 Act also lacked clear rules defining who had ultimate authority over monetary policy-making within the Federal Reserve System, especially when the interests of the Board and the Banks came into conflict. Absent explicit rules to define their formal responsibilities, neither the Board, the Banks, nor the Treasury had the legal standing (nor political legitimacy) to claim sole authority. This created conflict among the System's stakeholders, as each tried to gain control over monetary policy-making. Between 1914 and 1935 the System underwent a significant shift in its organizational structure, moving from its original decentralized governance model to that of a "real" central bank. In this dissertation, I apply the negotiated order perspective to the case of the Federal Reserve System's governance structure and show that both its initial decentralized structure (as prescribed by the 1913 Act) and the subsequent structural changes (leading to the 1935 Act), were a result of negotiation and a "structural process" extending back decades. Using this historical case, I show that the negotiated order perspective can provide a more comprehensive account of organizational change, generally, and of the emergence of organizational structures, specifically.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0093.
■650 4▼aSociology.
■650 4▼aLaw.
■653 ▼aEmergence
■653 ▼aFederal Reserve System
■653 ▼aNegotiated order
■653 ▼aOrganization
■653 ▼aOrganizational structures
■690 ▼a0626
■690 ▼a0398
■690 ▼a0635
■71020▼aIndiana University▼bSociology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-12A.
■790 ▼a0093
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17162255▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
미리보기
내보내기
chatGPT토론
Ai 추천 관련 도서
detalle info
- Reserva
- 캠퍼스간 도서대출
- 서가에 없는 책 신고
- Mi carpeta
