서브메뉴
검색
Contingent Radicalization: Government Repression and Ethnonationalist Political Mobilization- [electronic resource]
Contingent Radicalization: Government Repression and Ethnonationalist Political Mobilization- [electronic resource]
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- Control Number
- 0016934398
- International Standard Book Number
- 9798380320993
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 300
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Fabrizio, Ashley Marie.
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- [S.l.] : Stanford University., 2021
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021
- Physical Description
- 1 online resource(321 p.)
- General Note
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
- General Note
- Advisor: Laitin, David;Blaydes, Lisa;Milani, Abbas;Weinstein, Jeremy.
- Dissertation Note
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2021.
- Restrictions on Access Note
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- Summary, Etc.
- 요약Political movements for autonomy by geographically concentrated minority ethnic groups are a threat to nation-building, and often met with repression. When do ethnonationalist movements mobilize for self-determination and political autonomy with the potential of facing repression? When do a regime's repressive tactics actually incite mass political mobilization rather than quelling it? In order to answer these questions, this project deconstructs what appear to be perpetual cycles of contention, cataloguing both government and ethnic group actions across time and identifying the onset and perpetuation of contentious cycles. Based on an extensive survey of existing historical research on government treatment of Kurds, the introductory chapter introduces a new, comprehensive dataset on large-scale Kurdish mobilization in four countries from 1917 to 2013 and anti-Kurd repressive efforts in the same time period. The dataset relies on a generalizable typology of government ethnic repressions that differentiates violence, political exclusion, property and forced resettlement repressions, martial law and mobility limits, ethnic, language, cultural and religious bans, and employment, education, and economic denials. The dataset also introduces a new dimension capturing the origins of government ethnic repression and codes each origin as either "provoked" or "unprovoked" by previous dissent coming from one or more members of the targeted ethnic group.Chapter 2 presents a new framework for understanding cycles of government repression and ethnonationalist mobilization, called "contingent radicalization." In this framework, ethnonationalist mobilization depends on ethnic entrepreneurs' organizational capacity and ethnic group members' inclination to engage in nationalist political action. Government repression affects both components, and different substantive types of government repression have diverging effects. To predict the effects of different ethnic repression types, the contingent radicalization theory deconstructs the elements of ethnic entrepreneur organizational capacity and ethnic group member inclination to mobilize, hypothesizing repression effects on each element. Ethnic entrepreneur capacity is a function of opened or closed political windows of opportunity to recruit for their movements and amplify their political message, while ethnic group member inclination depends on emotions and perceptions of the state. Following this framework generates hypotheses tested in later empirical chapters, including that violence and property or resettlement repressions tend to increase future mobilization levels. This chapter also outlines a theory of why we might expect provoked repressions to tend to increase mobilization more so than unprovoked repressions.To examine whether repression foments or quells future mobilization for the case of Kurd-State relations, Chapter 3 conducts statistical analysis of pooled cross-national time-series data from Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey since World War I. Models that do not distinguish between repression types consistently show that ethnic repression is positively correlated with future levels of large-scale ethnonationalist mobilization. Models that differentiate repression types show that some tend to foment mobilization while others tend to quell it. In particular, physically coercive repressions like violence, property destructions, forced resettlements, and martial law tend to increase future mobilization levels while economic repressions tend to depress them. This chapter also conducts exploratory statistical analysis regarding howmovements mobilize after different repression types, including movement causes, organizational features, and tactics.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Radicalism.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Bans.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- History.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Martial law.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Minority & ethnic groups.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Kurdish people.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Political leadership.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- World War I.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Violence.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Religion.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Political science.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Political movements.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Education.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Ethnic studies.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Law.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Military history.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Military studies.
- Added Entry-Corporate Name
- Stanford University.
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-03A.
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertation Abstract International
- Electronic Location and Access
- 로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
- Control Number
- joongbu:643138
Info Détail de la recherche.
- Réservation
- 캠퍼스간 도서대출
- 서가에 없는 책 신고
- My Folder