서브메뉴
검색
A Qualitative Study of Therapist Dishonesty- [electronic resource]
A Qualitative Study of Therapist Dishonesty- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문
- Control Number
- 0016935290
- International Standard Book Number
- 9798380569224
- Dewey Decimal Classification Number
- 157
- Main Entry-Personal Name
- Newman, Mandy.
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- [S.l.] : Columbia University., 2023
- Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023
- Physical Description
- 1 online resource(111 p.)
- General Note
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
- General Note
- Advisor: Farber, Barry.
- Dissertation Note
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2023.
- Restrictions on Access Note
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- Summary, Etc.
- 요약This qualitative study aimed to investigate psychotherapists' experience of dishonesty in the therapy setting. Therapist dishonesty is broadly defined as "behaviors or words, spoken or withheld, that are meant to deceive or mislead" (Jackson & Farber, 2021, p. 1). Though it is anecdotally acknowledged in the clinical literature, the phenomenon of therapist dishonesty has been empirically under-researched and unexplored, in favor of topics such as client dishonesty and client and therapist self-disclosure. Designed as a follow-up to a quantitative study of 401 participants (Jackson & Farber, 2021), the present study aimed to capture a comprehensive phenomenological understanding of the circumstances, motives, feelings, perceived consequences, guidelines, and attitudes therapists carry about dishonesty in therapy. Further, this study aims to understand the extent to which therapists, in practice, are dishonest, and whether this occurrence is consistent with professional ethics and guidelines regarding dishonesty. Additionally, this study intends to review and synthesize the advice practicing therapists would provide to beginning therapists on handling situations in which they are tempted to refrain from telling the entire truth to patients.Following the methodology of Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR), 20 psychotherapists participated in semi-structured interviews prompting the factors that contribute to honesty and dishonesty in psychotherapy and its perceived impacts and clinical implications. Nine domains and various salient findings emerged from the analysis. Findings revealed that most commonly, dishonesty occurs around personal disclosures to patients, reasons for dishonesty are typically associated with boundary setting to protect therapists' needs or patients' feelings, while nearly all therapists would not have handled their dishonest moment differently, many regret this moment, and typically, therapists contend that their honest disclosure have increased, rather than decreased, over the course of their careers. Therapist dishonesty and its association with clinical tact, therapist disclosure, and therapist matching are discussed. Limitations, clinical implications for novice therapists, and future directions are noted.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Clinical psychology.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Psychology.
- Subject Added Entry-Topical Term
- Behavioral psychology.
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Psychotherapists
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Therapist dishonesty
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Client dishonesty
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Consensual Qualitative Research
- Index Term-Uncontrolled
- Disclosure
- Added Entry-Corporate Name
- Columbia University TC: Clinical Psychology
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-04B.
- Host Item Entry
- Dissertation Abstract International
- Electronic Location and Access
- 로그인을 한후 보실 수 있는 자료입니다.
- Control Number
- joongbu:639113
MARC
008240219s2023 ulk 00 kor■001000016935290
■00520240214101914
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798380569224
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30687651
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a157
■1001 ▼aNewman, Mandy.
■24512▼aA Qualitative Study of Therapist Dishonesty▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]▼bColumbia University. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(111 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Farber, Barry.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aThis qualitative study aimed to investigate psychotherapists' experience of dishonesty in the therapy setting. Therapist dishonesty is broadly defined as "behaviors or words, spoken or withheld, that are meant to deceive or mislead" (Jackson & Farber, 2021, p. 1). Though it is anecdotally acknowledged in the clinical literature, the phenomenon of therapist dishonesty has been empirically under-researched and unexplored, in favor of topics such as client dishonesty and client and therapist self-disclosure. Designed as a follow-up to a quantitative study of 401 participants (Jackson & Farber, 2021), the present study aimed to capture a comprehensive phenomenological understanding of the circumstances, motives, feelings, perceived consequences, guidelines, and attitudes therapists carry about dishonesty in therapy. Further, this study aims to understand the extent to which therapists, in practice, are dishonest, and whether this occurrence is consistent with professional ethics and guidelines regarding dishonesty. Additionally, this study intends to review and synthesize the advice practicing therapists would provide to beginning therapists on handling situations in which they are tempted to refrain from telling the entire truth to patients.Following the methodology of Consensual Qualitative Research (CQR), 20 psychotherapists participated in semi-structured interviews prompting the factors that contribute to honesty and dishonesty in psychotherapy and its perceived impacts and clinical implications. Nine domains and various salient findings emerged from the analysis. Findings revealed that most commonly, dishonesty occurs around personal disclosures to patients, reasons for dishonesty are typically associated with boundary setting to protect therapists' needs or patients' feelings, while nearly all therapists would not have handled their dishonest moment differently, many regret this moment, and typically, therapists contend that their honest disclosure have increased, rather than decreased, over the course of their careers. Therapist dishonesty and its association with clinical tact, therapist disclosure, and therapist matching are discussed. Limitations, clinical implications for novice therapists, and future directions are noted.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0054.
■650 4▼aClinical psychology.
■650 4▼aPsychology.
■650 4▼aBehavioral psychology.
■653 ▼aPsychotherapists
■653 ▼aTherapist dishonesty
■653 ▼aClient dishonesty
■653 ▼aConsensual Qualitative Research
■653 ▼aDisclosure
■690 ▼a0622
■690 ▼a0621
■690 ▼a0384
■71020▼aColumbia University▼bTC: Clinical Psychology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-04B.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0054
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16935290▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
